Skip to main content

Easily persuaded?


Over the years Dan Pink has been a bit of a hero of mine so when I had the chance to join him for Breakfast at Soho House on one of his trips to London there was no hesitation.

I asked Dan whether he felt that, in order to drive behavior change, it was important to change the intrinsic beliefs of the individual to ensure the change was embedded?

He was quick to sketch out a 4 box matrix (because we consultants do love a 4 box matrix) to accompany his example about University students being asked to donate food to charity.

For a more exact version of this story see p141 of To Sell Is Human, however the gist of his answer was that students were grouped into two types; most likely to donate and least likely to.

Half of each group was sent a generic letter to say that there was a food drive taking place and that donations would be welcome. The other half of each group received a specific letter: addressed to them by name, specifying the ideal foods to donate such as pasta and tinned food and included a map of exactly where food could be dropped off on campus.

The students in the least likely group, who received the generic letter donated (and I quote) “a whopping 0%”. The most likely students who received the generic letter donated only 8%.  So this proved that people who are not naturally charitable were entirely unpersuaded by the letter and that only 8% of those likely to donate did.

However of the students who received the specific letter which was addressed to them, gave clear instructions and guidance on what to buy and where and when to drop it, those who were most likely to, donated an impressive 44%. The least likely students in receipt of the specific letter donated 25%.

The large increase from the naturally charitable group was impressive but the jump from 0% to 25% of the group deemed unlikely to donate is the most surprising. A Quarter of this group were so motivated by the personalised letter with the required detail that they changed their behavior from their natural uncharitable state and went out of their way to buy and donate food.

The point here is that the least likely to donate students did not suddenly become charitable, develop a social conscience or experience any other overall shift in their beliefs. What happened was that by being specific the students were provided with a clear path of action – it was made so easy for them to change their behavior that they simply did.

After the breakfast, I kept that slightly crumpled, hand drawn 4 box matrix and it now hangs at my desk to remind me that although I still think belief is important in embedding behavior change, it’s worth remembering that sometimes, the truth is - all you really need to do is make it easy for people to change.


*http://www.danpink.com